We all learned a lot about each other’s eating preferences on our trip to Italy. If I had to summarize, here are our dietary tenets…
Mom:
- It’s not breakfast unless it involves orange juice and milk.
- Every table should include a salt shaker.
- There is such a thing as “too much” marinara sauce.
- Meat makes it a meal.
Me:
- Live to eat.
- Salami is like a blood-sugar insurance policy – one slice at every meal keeps things ticking.
- There’s no such thing as too much pasta.
- If a restaurant has bruschetta, we’re ordering it.
Alicia:
- Eat to live.
- Black tea, hold the sugar – hot/cold throughout the day.
- Have yogurt, will travel.
- Coronettos whenever possible.
Further demonstrating how differently we approach food, shortly after returning, my sister shared this link for Soylent. I encourage you to check out the page and see if anything about the concept appeals to you. (Soylent is a food replacement product that provides nutrients via a powder that mixes into a drink.)
The stated benefits are:
- Time: Prepare multiple meals in minutes – no need to shop for individual ingredients or plan ahead
- Money: Spend less than $10 per day on food, and less than $4 per meal – get more than a day’s worth of meals for less than the cost of takeout
- Nutrition: Eat balanced and wholesome – get all of the essential nutrients required to fuel the human body
Sorry. This guy’s value proposition falls apart for me with the first bullet – I enjoy taking time to shop for ingredients and cook dinner. And more important than money or nutrition to me is TASTE. It might be wrong, but I eat for enjoyment, not nutrition. My sister on the other hand…
Granted, all you need to do is look at us to see how our eating philosophies have shaped our bodies. She’s an easy size 4, and I could definitely stand to lose a pound or, um, fifteen. Details.
Finally – because I’m mildly obsessed with Soylent and the fact that this guy thinks enough people are wired like my sister that there’s a market for this product – can we discuss the name? Is it a terrible or brilliant marketing move to name his product after the 1973 sci-fi movie Soylent Green, which is summarized by Wikipedia as “…the investigation into the murder of a wealthy businessman in a dystopian future suffering from pollution, overpopulation, depleted resources, poverty, dying oceans, and all-year humidity due to the greenhouse effect. Much of the population survives on processed food rations, including “soylent green.”
I mean, the plot does seem to be playing out in real life, so I can see where Soylent’s founder drew a connection. The problem, however, is that at the end of the film, you discover that “soylent green” is actually PEOPLE. So here’s guy in 2014, selling an unrecognizable nutritional powder and he’s deliberately named it something that calls to mind cannibalism. Interesting brand strategy.
Which camp are you in? Love to eat or eat for fuel?
pithypants 